Skip to main content

Exemptions from Real Property Taxation in New York State: 2023 County, City, and Town Assessment Rolls

Introduction

All real property in New York is subject to taxation unless specific legal provisions grant it exempt status, whereas personal property is not subject to taxation. Real property tax exemptions are granted on the basis of many different criteria, including the use to which the property is put, the owner's ability to pay taxes, the desire of the state and local governments to encourage certain economic or social activities, and other such considerations.1 Certain exemptions provide full relief from taxation (wholly exempt property) and others reduce the taxes which would otherwise be payable by varying degrees (partially exempt property). Some exemptions apply to taxes levied for county, city/town, and school purposes, whereas others pertain only to some of these purposes. Yet another difference involves the extent of local government autonomy: while some exemptions are mandated by state law, others are subject to local option and/or local determination of eligibility criteria.

This report presents exemption data for 2023 assessment rolls prepared by local assessors throughout New York.2 It covers town, city, and county (Tompkins and Nassau Counties) assessment rolls only; village rolls are not included.

Ultimately, the accuracy of the figures presented depends on the accuracy of the data submitted on the rolls. Although the overwhelming majority of reported exemptions could be related to specific legal provisions through the standardized reporting system provided by NYS Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Real Property Tax Services (ORPTS), a very small percentage could not be classified because incorrect codes were used, and are thus omitted from certain tables in this report. Similarly, any errors made by assessors in determining the value of a parcel, or the extent to which this value is exempt from taxation, will appear in the data contained herein. Also, experience has shown that some assessors may not keep the values placed on wholly exempt property fully up to date, as valuation of such property has, for the most part, no effect on local tax revenue. Incorrect assessed values may overstate or understate the effect of exemptions on local tax bases.

The remainder of the report presents a summary of the 2023 statewide statistics on exempt property in graphic and tabular format, followed by Appendix A, which contains a list of abbreviations and definitions for terms used in the detailed tables that comprise Appendix B.

Pie charts showing exemptions by type of owners

Table 1. Real Property tax exemptions by property group, 2023 assessment rolls

Table 1. Real Property tax exemptions, 2023 rolls
Group Number of exemptions Equalized Exempt Value ($000)
A. Residential Property other than Multiple Dwellings Non-Residential Property Owned by Certain Individuals 2,967,211 222,724,678
B. Property of New York State Government and Agencies 21,491 139,182,427
C. Property of Municipal Governments and Agencies, School Districts, BOCES, and Special Districts 115,061 269,105,386
D. Property of U.S. and Foreign Governments and Agencies, International or Interstate Agencies, and Indian Tribes 4,857 71,037,688
E. Property of Private Community Service Organizations, Social Organizations, and Professional Societies 71,789 162,362,601
F. Industrial, Commercial, and Public Service Property 19,579 92,169,785
G. Urban Renewal Property, Public Housing, and Private Subsidized Housing (Multiple Dwellings) 92,774 110,163,172
H. Agricultural and Forest Properties 115,374 13,888,902
Total, Valid Exemption Codes 3,408,136 1,080,634,638
Invalid Codes 3,777 1,817,998
TOTAL 3,411,913 1,082,452,636

Table 2. Exemptions for county purposes: Geographic areas with highest and lowest incidence of exempt value, 2023 assessment rolls

A. Ten with highest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt
1. Oswego 37.69% Salamanca (Cat.) 68.60% Scriba (Osw.) 84.14%
2. Tompkins 37.61% Rensselaer (Ren.) 66.74% Alfred (All.) 78.74%
3. Seneca 36.66% Albany (Alb.) 63.21% Blenheim (Scho.) 74.65%
4. St Lawrence 35.74% Ithaca (Tom.) 58.32% Romulus (Sen.) 74.07%
5. Oneida 34.11% Geneva (Ont.) 56.06% Ashford (Cat.) 72.82%
6. Albany 33.27% Syracuse (Ono.) 51.88% Marcy (One.) 72.07%
7. Niagara 31.56% Ogdensburg (St. L) 49.41% Massena (St. L) 68.56%
8. Schoharie 31.06% Peekskill (Wes.) 49.23% Verona (One.) 68.09%
9 Wyoming 30.99% Oneonta (Ots.) 46.82% Lewiston (Nia.) 66.40%
10. Allegany 30.72% Rome (One.) 46.11% Dover (Dut.) 65.33%
B. Ten with lowest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt
1. Hamilton 8.27% Mechanicville (Sar.) 8.23% Benson (Ham.) 1.04%
2. Putnam 9.62% Tonawanda (Eri.) 11.75% Inlet (Ham.) 1.88%
3. Warren 10.20% Sherrill (One.) 12.18% Arietta (Ham.) 1.90%
4. Saratoga 12.39% Lockport (Nia.) 12.99% Stratford (Ful.) 2.65%
5. Washington 12.93% Rye (Wes.) 13.19% Dresden (Was.) 2.86%
6. Ulster 13.86% Beacon (Dut.) 14.68% Hope (Ham.) 3.01%
7. Columbia 14.15% North Tonawanda (Nia.) 15.36% Bolton (War.) 3.11%
8. Greene 15.20% Saratoga Springs (Sar.) 17.61% Ellicottville (Cat.) 3.13%
9. Fulton 15.92% Long Beach (Nas.) 18.90% Bleecker (Ful.) 3.22%
10. Rockland 16.16% Port Jervis (Ora.) 20.10% Pittsfield (Ots.) 3.32%

Table 3. Exemptions for county purposes: Counties ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 assessment rolls*

Table 3. Exemptions for county purposes: Counties ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 rolls*
Rank County No. of exemptions Exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Oswego 11,287 4,913,933 37.69%
2. Tompkins 7,003 6,068,465 37.61%
3. Seneca 4,910 1,926,236 36.66%
4. St Lawrence 12,611 4,190,478 35.74%
5. Oneida 21,532 8,696,843 34.11%
6. Albany 19,088 17,531,400 33.27%
7. Niagara 18,797 8,346,089 31.56%
8. Schoharie 5,111 1,495,575 31.06%
9. Wyoming 7,118 1,438,375 30.99%
10. Allegany 7,208 1,283,717 30.72%
11. Jefferson 11,601 3,846,564 26.98%
12. Cattaraugus 10,559 2,278,244 26.70%
13. Broome 13,824 4,515,229 26.57%
14. Yates 4,637 1,302,495 26.49%
15. Tioga 5,028 1,325,749 26.33%
16. Rensselaer 12,281 5,384,663 26.19%
17. Nassau 475,364 102,200,477 25.70%
18. Montgomery 6,061 1,193,290 25.36%
19. Chautauqua 16,120 3,298,193 24.15%
20. Livingston 7,775 1,557,619 24.10%
21. Lewis 5,143 907,595 23.97%
22. Onondaga 35,917 12,504,194 23.74%
23. Genesee 8,231 1,252,299 23.59%
24. Steuben 14,844 2,306,922 23.31%
25. Sullivan 8,690 4,016,062 23.24%
26. Franklin 5,134 1,519,406 22.60%
27. Cayuga 10,015 1,929,374 22.37%
28. Schenectady 9,712 3,869,247 21.89%
29. Cortland 5,072 947,727 21.66%
30. Westchester 32,531 63,118,613 21.51%
31. Clinton 9,052 1,864,089 21.10%
32. Orleans 5,557 669,360 20.75%
33. Madison 8,515 1,540,951 20.71%
34. Otsego 6,808 1,548,633 20.67%
35. Chemung 7,472 1,429,508 20.39%
36. Ontario 10,608 3,430,787 20.27%
37. Chenango 6,105 836,028 20.21%
38. Suffolk 118,192 117,761,648 19.88%
39. Dutchess 18,586 11,132,042 19.74%
40. Herkimer 6,675 1,543,764 19.41%
41. Wayne 9,714 1,753,999 18.83%
42. Monroe 52,907 14,937,487 18.75%
43. Schuyler 3,266 514,570 18.69%
44. Erie 71,619 22,186,865 18.54%
45. Orange 24,006 11,763,810 18.10%
46. Essex 5,293 1,884,439 17.02%
47. Delaware 5,282 1,685,936 16.70%
48. Rockland 16,076 10,731,188 16.16%
49. Fulton 4,967 956,707 15.92%
50. Greene 5,463 1,804,870 15.20%
51. Columbia 7,437 2,151,452 14.15%
52. Ulster 14,593 5,001,329 13.86%
53. Washington 8,021 989,125 12.93%
54. Saratoga 16,167 5,204,314 12.39%
55. Warren 6,673 1,705,284 10.20%
56. Putnam 6,474 2,017,579 9.62%
57. Hamilton 866 328,217 8.27%
*Excludes New York City boroughs; New York City data included in Table 4

Table 4. Exemptions for county purposes: Cities ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 assessment rolls

Table 4. Exemptions for county purposes: Cities ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 rolls
Rank City No. of exemptions Exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Salamanca 1,433 259,172 68.60%
2. Rensselaer 469 1,240,916 66.74%
3. Albany 5,758 11,999,475 63.21%
4. Ithaca 862 3,575,632 58.32%
5. Geneva 751 796,024 56.06%
6. Syracuse 6,878 6,968,163 51.88%
7. Ogdensburg 812 349,820 49.41%
8. Peekskill 753 2,610,070 49.23%
9. Oneonta 506 540,043 46.82%
10. Rome 2,859 1,574,530 46.11%
11. Watervliet 356 482,328 46.06%
12. Troy 1,981 2,192,534 45.88%
13. Niagara Falls 3,694 1,995,339 45.58%
14. Little Falls 328 188,505 45.02%
15. Jamestown 2,221 604,740 39.36%
16. Elmira 1,562 529,731 38.45%
17. Schenectady 3,263 1,865,903 37.38%
18. Utica 3,671 1,506,023 36.97%
19. Oswego 1,049 596,989 36.74%
20. Cortland 784 416,012 36.11%
21. Yonkers 5,268 14,475,469 35.76%
22. Binghamton 2,388 1,029,513 35.11%
23. Norwich 333 153,198 34.70%
24. Olean 1,117 325,896 34.45%
25. Canandaigua 522 502,150 33.79%
26. Poughkeepsie 1,050 1,242,247 33.00%
27. Watertown 1,548 639,899 32.07%
28. Plattsburgh 1,106 573,106 32.06%
29. White Plains 1,226 5,425,497 31.61%
30. Johnstown 566 287,253 31.35%
31. Auburn 1,776 565,628 30.22%
32. Amsterdam 1,201 331,307 30.01%
33. Hornell 730 137,937 29.60%
34. Oneida 1,127 265,660 29.44%
35. Dunkirk 1,059 219,299 29.21%
36. Buffalo 18,783 6,975,435 28.94%
37. Rochester 10,781 3,738,403 28.84%
38. New Rochelle 1,856 5,325,165 28.22%
39. Hudson 430 349,829 26.84%
40. Mt Vernon 1,450 2,985,818 25.90%
41. Newburgh 834 674,261 25.73%
42. Kingston 1,433 936,381 25.47%
43. New York City 576,042 469,492,318 25.41%
44. Gloversville 933 168,764 25.02%
45. Glen Cove 7,735 1,687,779 24.36%
46. Glens Falls 964 425,919 23.55%
47. Batavia 1,033 236,667 23.47%
48. Fulton 811 150,806 23.43%
49. Cohoes 813 347,868 22.97%
50. Corning 798 239,829 22.95%
51. Middletown 1,056 646,515 21.12%
52. Lackawanna 1,324 244,528 20.27%
53. Port Jervis 517 163,537 20.10%
54. Long Beach 9,798 1,715,296 18.90%
55. Saratoga Springs 1,313 1,384,289 17.61%
56. North Tonawanda 2,939 441,151 15.36%
57. Beacon 645 337,341 14.68%
58. Rye 426 1,743,863 13.19%
59. Lockport 1,228 187,688 12.99%
60. Sherrill 57 39,658 12.18%
61. Tonawanda 1,415 160,898 11.75%
62. Mechanicville 217 29,111 8.23%

Table 5. Exemptions for county purposes: Towns with over 50 percent full value exempt, 2023 assessment rolls

Table 5. Exemptions for county purposes: Towns with over 50 percent full value exempt, 2023 rolls
Rank Town No. of exemptions Exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Scriba (Osw.) 667 2,854,455 84.14%
2. Alfred (All.) 313 513,129 78.74%
3. Blenheim (Scho.) 139 177,857 74.65%
4. Romulus (Sen.) 407 884,251 74.07%
5. Ashford (Cat.) 355 532,701 72.82%
6. Marcy (One.) 602 1,881,115 72.07%
7. Massena (St. L) 1073 1,450,840 68.56%
8. Verona (One.) 982 1,058,257 68.09%
9. Lewiston (Nia.) 1342 3,830,759 66.40%
10. Dover (Dut.) 506 2,029,803 65.33%
11. Le Ray (Jef.) 808 1,135,382 63.60%
12. Orangeville (Wyo.) 309 222,890 60.94%
13. Greenwood (Ste.) 304 143,322 60.57%
14. Tyre (Sen.) 317 154,132 60.52%
15. Arkwright (Cha.) 203 158,008 59.60%
16. Nichols (Tio.) 272 253,817 58.69%
17. Harrisburg (Lew.) 257 77,420 57.93%
18. Martinsburg (Lew.) 425 159,516 56.71%
19. Cherry Creek (Cha.) 257 97,528 53.03%
20. Delhi (Del.) 337 598,943 52.83%
21. Eagle (Wyo.) 387 105,925 52.65%
22. Sheldon (Wyo.) 621 232,890 52.15%
23. Fairfield (Her.) 352 146,775 51.46%
24. Sharon (Scho.) 357 170,813 50.79%
25. Eaton (Mad.) 636 298,762 50.63%

Table 6. Geographic areas with highest and lowest incidence of local-option exempt value, 2023 assessment rolls

A. Ten with highest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option*
1. Fulton 24.63% Johnstown (Ful.) 41.45% Ontario (Way.) 63.07%
2. Hamilton 20.51% Saratoga Springs (Sar.) 27.53% Shelter Island (Suf.) 49.89%
3. Oswego 20.00% Auburn (Cay.) 26.30% Lake Pleasant (Ham.) 45.78%
4. Wayne 19.47% Tonawanda (Eri.) 20.38% Chautauqua (Cha.) 43.81%
5. Putnam 16.70% Lackawanna (Eri.) 19.52% Jewett (Gre.) 43.12%
6. Saratoga 16.65% Buffalo (Eri.) 17.74% Watson (Lew.) 40.78%
7. Monroe 16.48% Newburgh (Ora.) 15.72% Volney (Osw.) 40.12%
8. Columbia 14.95% North Tonawanda (Nia.) 15.51% Rhinebeck (Dut.) 39.71%
9. Washington 14.75% Rochester (Mon.) 14.01% Warren (Her.) 36.95%
10. Ulster 14.54% Hudson (Col.) 14.01% Oppenheim (Ful.) 34.73%
B. Ten with lowest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option*
1. Tompkins 3.56% Ithaca (Tom.) 2.01% Red House (Cat.) 0.00%
2. Wyoming 3.83% Little Falls (Her.) 2.09% Alfred (All.) 0.45%
3. Seneca 3.85% White Plains (Wes.) 2.40% Harrisburg (Lew.) 0.53%
4. Allegany 3.89% Albany (Alb.) 2.44% Blenheim (Scho.) 0.54%
5. Yates 4.53% Rensselaer (Ren.) 2.59% Dover (Dut.) 0.69%
6. Schuyler 4.76% Binghamton (Bro.) 2.87% Romulus (Sen.) 0.72%
7. Delaware 4.97% Watervliet (Alb.) 2.96% Delhi (Del.) 0.92%
8. Schoharie 5.16% Peekskill (Wes.) 3.02% Bombay (Fra.) 0.94%
9. St Lawrence 5.47% Geneva (Ont.) 3.79% Marcy (One.) 0.97%
10. Cattaraugus 5.50% Oswego (Osw.) 3.81% Ashford (Cat.) 0.98%
*Exempt value of local-option exemptions divided by total exempt value.

Table 7. Exempt value attributable to local option, counties ranked by percent of exempt value, 2023 assessment rolls

Table 7. Exempt value attributable to local option, counties ranked by percent of exempt value, 2023 rolls
Rank County Exempt value local option ($000) Total exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Fulton 369,165 1,499,084 24.63%
2. Hamilton 80,652 393,250 20.51%
3. Oswego 1,193,637 5,967,465 20.00%
4. Wayne 528,133 2,712,183 19.47%
5. Putnam 504,876 3,024,109 16.70%
6. Saratoga 1,195,966 7,182,782 16.65%
7. Monroe 3,359,646 20,381,830 16.48%
8. Columbia 409,976 2,742,610 14.95%
9. Washington 231,323 1,568,591 14.75%
10. Ulster 966,846 6,647,546 14.54%
11. Rockland 1,954,250 13,860,529 14.10%
12. Erie 4,169,023 30,148,046 13.83%
13. Warren 312,252 2,275,403 13.72%
14. Cayuga 349,090 2,620,665 13.32%
15. Nassau 15,967,800 121,730,318 13.12%
16. Onondaga 2,029,400 16,003,042 12.68%
17. Greene 291,871 2,442,815 11.95%
18. Orange 1,724,375 14,610,977 11.80%
19. Dutchess 1,612,817 13,684,831 11.79%
20. Cortland 152,054 1,349,249 11.27%
21. Rensselaer 737,990 6,570,075 11.23%
22. Suffolk 15,110,833 136,134,642 11.10%
23. Chautauqua 476,158 4,520,255 10.53%
24. Orleans 105,237 1,038,851 10.13%
25. Clinton 241,369 2,521,470 9.57%
26. Schenectady 452,559 4,981,710 9.08%
27. Livingston 185,914 2,073,305 8.97%
28. Essex 195,747 2,246,410 8.71%
29. Broome 519,750 6,090,329 8.53%
30. Steuben 254,646 3,148,917 8.09%
31. Chenango 103,675 1,287,000 8.06%
32. Chemung 167,025 2,133,594 7.83%
33. Montgomery 126,252 1,668,518 7.57%
34. Lewis 86,518 1,176,653 7.35%
35. Otsego 150,056 2,087,516 7.19%
36. Ontario 316,097 4,398,012 7.19%
37. Herkimer 155,828 2,171,376 7.18%
38. Genesee 125,984 1,784,676 7.06%
39. Sullivan 320,729 4,611,106 6.96%
40. Westchester 5,060,905 73,530,929 6.88%
41. Oneida 729,405 10,727,852 6.80%
42. Jefferson 311,082 4,593,954 6.77%
43. Madison 145,558 2,196,518 6.63%
44. Tioga 120,733 1,852,835 6.52%
45. Niagara 608,645 10,365,251 5.87%
46. Franklin 111,956 1,928,759 5.80%
47. Albany 1,104,813 19,563,812 5.65%
48. Cattaraugus 164,133 2,983,794 5.50%
49. St Lawrence 279,856 5,111,542 5.47%
50. Schoharie 93,579 1,813,154 5.16%
51. Delaware 109,943 2,210,404 4.97%
52. Schuyler 33,695 707,865 4.76%
53. Yates 69,059 1,525,567 4.53%
54. Allegany 66,322 1,702,958 3.89%
55. Seneca 86,377 2,241,237 3.85%
56. Wyoming 69,665 1,817,780 3.83%
57. Tompkins 234,689 6,596,365 3.56%

Table 8. City/Town distribution of exempt value attributable to local option exemptions: 2023 assessment rolls

Table 8. City/Town distribution of exempt value attributable to local option exemptions: 2023 rolls
Percent of value in local option exemptions Number of cities/towns Percent of cities/towns
0 - 9.99 557 55.980%
10 - 19.99 346 34.774%
20 - 20.99 77 7.739%
30 - 30.99 8 0.804%
40 or more 7 0.704%

1 Most exemptions are granted under Article 4 of the Real Property Tax Law, but others are authorized by a wide variety of statutes ranging from the Agriculture and Markets Law to the Transportation Law.

2The material in the report relates to exemptions only. Not covered are the restricted assessments which apply to certain types of property (e.g., condominiums), tax abatement programs, and formerly real property which has been statutorily redefined as personal (non-taxable) property (e.g., certain switching equipment owned by telephone companies). Restricted assessments, tax abatements, and statutory redefinitions, like exemptions, are tax expenditures in that they reduce or shift tax liability.

| Table of contents | Top of page |

Updated: